<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Artist&#8217;s Armoury</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hydragenic.com/2008/04/24/the-artists-armoury/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hydragenic.com/2008/04/24/the-artists-armoury/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:41:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hg</title>
		<link>http://hydragenic.com/2008/04/24/the-artists-armoury/comment-page-1/#comment-3504</link>
		<dc:creator>Hg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wokkil.pair.com/hydragen/hydragenic.new/2008/04/24/the-artists-armoury/#comment-3504</guid>
		<description>Agreed.  I liked this for its pithy description of the phenomenon, rather than seeing it as a radical and profound new insight into Bj&#246;rk in particular.
There was a recurring theme of weapons-related imagery on Hydragenic during its first year or so and I guess it still has a certain appeal to me.
Maybe I should have titled this post Armoury Of Me.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed.  I liked this for its pithy description of the phenomenon, rather than seeing it as a radical and profound new insight into Bj&ouml;rk in particular.<br />
There was a recurring theme of weapons-related imagery on Hydragenic during its first year or so and I guess it still has a certain appeal to me.<br />
Maybe I should have titled this post Armoury Of Me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

